 | | |
| | |
|
Spaces home  NaimoliPhotosProfileFriendsMore |  Tools   |
Naimoli |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
April 11 The Death SpiralThis was posted by Jacob Goldstein on the WSJ Health Blog. I love the visual display.Death Spiral Holds Enduring AppealPosted by Jacob Goldstein
It’s tough to resist a graphic that begins, “Total odds of dying, any cause: 1 in 1.” The image caught our eye on Digg, where it’s garnered thousands of Diggs and hundreds of comments in the past few days. A bit of Googling led us to National Geographic, and a few calls led us to Margaret Zackowitz, who edited the section where the item ran in 2006. The editors referred to it as the “death spiral.” We asked her about the image’s recurring waves of Internet stardom. “You know what it is?” she said. “Everybody’s got to die. You always want to write about what’s going to affect somebody, and nobody gets off the hook for that.” The graphic is based on 2003 figures from the National Safety Council, a nonprofit group that puts together tables of this stuff based on data from the CDC and the Census Bureau. You can see newer figures and lots more causes of death on the NSC Web site. Your chances of dying by being “confined to or trapped in a low-oxygen environment,” for example, are one in 271,315. Far more likely (1 in 75,968) is death by “threat to breathing due to cave-in, falling earth and other substances.” Then there are the biggies we write about all the time: heart disease (1 in 5), cancer (1 in 7) and stroke (1 in 24). Alan Hoskins, manager of the nonprofit group’s statistics department, told us the NSC put together the table years ago, in response to frequent calls (many from reporters) asking whether one cause of death was more common than another. “It’s a subject of interest to a lot of people — what am I likely to die from?” Hoskins told us. “It has a personal connection.” Image courtesy National Geographic magazine March 16 Want Generic Biotech? You Might Wait 14 More Yearshttp://blogs.wsj.com/health/2008/03/14/want-generic-biotech-you-might-wait-14-more-years/ In any negotiation, there is no substitute to getting your number on the table first! It's a shame that the Generic Pharmaceutical Association didn't have the same negotiation professor that I had :) Honestly, Anna Eshoo (D-Calif.) and Joe Barton (R-Tx.) might be reaching for the stars with H.R. 5629, the Pathway for Biosimilars Act (http://eshoo.house.gov/images//biosimilars%20summary.pdf), but it is good to see that someone is willing to fight for the Life Science Industries right to return value and remain incentivized. Something tells me that California's 14th district (Eshoo's district) includes the Biotech corridor. However, in my opinion, I think that like in all good negotiations, the right number is somewhere between the two positions. Hopefully this segment of the industry can find that balance and make certain that the value to the company is protected, while the general public can get the affordable biologics that they need. Patent Absurdity
I would encourage everyone to read this article. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120535959743831617.html?mod=sphere_wd#
My concern is simply around the threat against the incentive that drug companies have to continually innovate. I recognize that there needs to be some work with respect to price tiering in those markets where it makes sense, and in doing so the drug companies might better avoid the tipping point that may be coming around this issue, but the fact of the matter is that the world is better off pharmacologically speaking thanks to the work of primarily US based Pharma companies. The incentive, ultimately, is shareholder value. We must protect the ability of companies such as Roch and Pfizer to generate continued and sustainable value for those who chose to risk their own capital in these organizations. March 14 Talking about Metabolic Pathway Diagrams with WPFHello. My name is Michael Naimoli and I'm a Director at Microsoft responsible for a team of brilliant people all working to make a difference in the Life Sciences industry. This industry is complex to say the least. Most interesting about it is the fact that it struggles to be innovative, but must do so in a risk averse climate. I don't mean to minimize the fact that this industry is full of some high rollers...but consider what they're up against! Sam Batterman, one of my colleagues at Microsoft, has been working hard to understand how these organizations manage the complexity of the data available to them. Take some time and review some of his latest postings. Quote: This is from Sam Batterman's Blog Metabolic Pathway Diagrams with WPF |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Invite as friend
